Vaccines: So ... the science is settled, eh?

Some folks are unable to bring themselves to question the vaccine paradigm.

"The science is settled," you will hear some say. They are quite absolutely 100% certain they know everything they need to know.

Here are 2 items to muse upon if you subscribe to this mode of thought:

2-minute YouTube 'Is the Science Really Settled?'

& a bit of an essay on the fallacy of this thought about science being settled:

"The CDC and advocates for mandatory vaccination consistently repeat a dangerous mantra that finds no warranted basis in medical science. This monolithic industry, now a massive network of private and government institutions, state senates, and supported by a compliant media, want us to believe that science has finally settled the debate over vaccine safety and efficacy. All the data is in, so we are told, and no further research and discussion is necessary because vaccines have been officially ruled to pose no neurological and immunological risk to infants, children, pregnant mothers, adults and the elderly.

This official policy is founded upon flawed premises and a primitive understanding about the complexities of the human body and its multifaceted immunological system. And this argument’s fallacy is actually quite simple. Valid science is never settled. The myth of “settled science,” which is especially endemic to the biological and medical sciences that rely on private financial interests, is sheer propaganda. Valid science, on the other hand, constantly seeks new discoveries to acquire further knowledge and greater understanding. The pursuit to fully comprehend the complexity of our biological, immunological and physiological systems, therefore, is in perpetual infinite regress.

Today’s justifications for medical intervention, whether by drugs or vaccines, eventually become tomorrow’s barbarities as science further penetrates the hidden functions and operations of the human organism. Hence valid medical research should elicit new questions and not settle upon incomplete facts that are then proselytized as universal truths.

A medical science that refuses to ask new questions and settles upon disputed beliefs to sustain an industry’s financial portfolio is Scientism, a quasi-faith-based creed now institutionalized to promulgate repressive laws. These laws then advance Scientism’s authority. Unfortunately, today this accurately represents the sad state of vaccine research and vaccination policy. Modern vaccine science, and conventional medicine in general, has morphed into a new fascism, a rigid doctrine that has sacrificed the foundations of scientific integrity on the altar of institutional greed, privilege and profit."

Read the rest of this article here.

 

Anytime someone tells you NOT question something, you had probably best sit up, take notice, & do a little more digging.

Two years ago, I'd done no digging whatsoever. I was simply 100% in the dark about the issue.

Now, I've done lots (& lots) of research. I am no longer in the dark.

I no longer buy into the vaccine paradigm, & am only sorry I did not begin my questioning, & my digging, much, much sooner. As in, decades sooner.

Our refusal to question things we are told by supposedly infallible "experts" can bear some very serious & long-lasting consequences in our lives, & the lives of our loved ones. Unintended consequences, as they say.

You need to take charge of your own education - not simply take on "faith" what others have told you!

 

I feel sure you're clever enough to know these 2 things already, but please do be sure to always remember them, alright? With the vaccine issue ... or any other.

#AlwaysFollowTheMoney!

and, in the case of any drug or pharmaceutical product

#AlwaysReadTheProductInserts!

(you may have to beg your medical practitioner to give you a copy - but believe me, you need to read the darn things --- all the way through to the bitter end!)

Sagan on truth.png

 

p.s. a few weeks later: another quick debunking on this topic here. Trust me, it's worth seeing!